transportation:train
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| transportation:train [2025/11/10 23:05] – [Bart] timb | transportation:train [2026/09/03 00:36] (current) – [Articles] timb | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
| https:// | https:// | ||
| + | == How Railroad Crossings Work == | ||
| + | January 16, 2024 - Practical Engineering | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Note that this article is a transcript of the video embedded above.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you’ve ever ridden a bike, driven a car, or operated pretty much any other vehicle on earth, there’s a fact you’ve probably taken for granted: you can see farther than it takes to stop. Within the span between seeing a stationary hazard and colliding with it, you have enough time to recognize it, apply the brakes, and come to a stop to avoid a collision. Your sight distance is greater than your stopping distance; it sounds almost silly, but this is a critical requirement for nearly all human-operated machines. But it’s not true for trains. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Engineers can see just as far as the rest of us, but the stopping distance of a fully laden freight train can be upwards of a mile. That means if an engineer can see something on the tracks ahead, it’s often already too late. So, trains need a lot of safety infrastructure to make up for that deficiency. For one: trains almost always have the right-of-way when they cross a road or highway at the same level, or at grade. The cars have to wait; And, we use a litany of warning devices at grade crossings to enforce that right-of-way and try to prevent collisions. In most cases, these devices have to detect the impending arrival of a train and give motorists enough time to clear the tracks or come to a stop. It sounds simple, but the engineering that makes that possible is, I think, really interesting, | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||
| Line 561: | Line 571: | ||
| https:// | https:// | ||
| + | == Caltrain Shows Why Every Region Should Be Moving Toward Regional Rail == | ||
| + | |||
| + | January 09, 2026 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Caltrain recently replaced diesel trains with electric, cutting 25 minutes from the trip time. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Faster speed, increased frequency, and more reliable service are causing ridership growth on Caltrain, the San Francisco Bay Area’s passenger railway. The ridership increase and service upgrades are a direct result of the electrification of Caltrain’s entire fleet of rolling stock in September 2024. “For the first time in the railroad’s 160-year history, diesel service was replaced with electric service along the 50-mile main line between San Francisco and San Jose,” Caltrain reported. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Caltrain’s total ridership in Fiscal Year 2025 (ending June 30, 2025) increased 47% over the previous fiscal year, from 6.2 million to 9.1 million passengers. In June 2025, Caltrain recorded more than 1 million monthly passengers for the first time since the pandemic. It passed the 1 million-passenger mark in July and August as well, which was roughly a 60% increase over ridership totals for those months in 2024, just before the fleet’s electrification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The results are a powerful argument for electrification and the adoption of a regional rail model of service by every commuter railway in North America — i.e., offering fast, frequent service throughout the day, including weekends, instead of catering to antiquated commuting patterns and weekday rush hours. | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||
| Line 832: | Line 855: | ||
| https:// | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Map ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | == The world railway map == | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| ====== United States ====== | ====== United States ====== | ||
transportation/train.1762815946.txt.gz · Last modified: by timb
